Contact us
Quality-and-Security-Audited-Together

1,400+

Test Cases Executed

100%

Test Coverage

82%

Pass Rate

Overview

The client operates a jewellery and gold investment platform, combining a consumer-facing mobile app (iOS and Android) with an admin panel used to manage schemes, agents, customers, and payments. As a fintech product handling recurring payments, gold-rate-linked schemes, and customer financial data, the platform needed both functional validation and a dedicated security review before and during its production rollout. Testvox was engaged to run a combined functional testing and Android security assessment across the mobile app and admin panel.

Challenges

Before the engagement, the client's platform faced three areas of concern common to fast-moving fintech products:

  • Dual-Platform Consistency The app needed to behave identically across iOS and Android while syncing correctly with a separate, much larger admin panel used for scheme, agent, and payment management.
  • Financial Workflow Reliability OTP-based login, gold/silver rate calculations, scheme subscriptions, and payment processing all needed to work correctly together, since a failure in any one directly affects real transactions.
  • Security Readiness for a Live Financial App Beyond functional correctness, a consumer app handling payments and personal data needed its underlying security posture — network configuration, permissions, SDK behavior, and code signing — independently reviewed rather than assumed.

Our Solution

Testvox structured this as two coordinated workstreams:

  1. Functional Test Coverage Across the Full Platform

    2. Designed and executed 1,400 test cases across the iOS app, Android app, and Admin Panel, covering login and OTP, home and dashboard screens, schemes, offers, profile management, notifications, and menu navigation — achieving 100% requirement coverage in the cycle.

  2. Module-Level Defect Density Analysis

    3. Broke down defects by application area (mobile app vs. admin panel) and by module, identifying which parts of the platform — particularly certain admin-panel workflows — carried a disproportionate share of high-severity issues, so engineering effort could be targeted rather than spread evenly

  3. Business-Critical Defect Triage

    4. Identified and escalated the defects with direct business impact — payment and transaction flows, authentication integrity, and data validation issues — ahead of lower-impact UI defects, giving the client a clear "fix first" list rather than an undifferentiated backlog.

  4. Independent Android Security Assessment

    5. Conducted a static security review of the Android application covering code signing, manifest configuration, network security setup, permissions, and third-party SDK behavior, benchmarked against standard mobile security practices for financial applications.

  5. Positive Control Verification

    6. Alongside the risk findings, confirmed a number of security fundamentals were already correctly implemented — including proper backup restrictions, no hardcoded credentials in the app binary, a valid production code-signing configuration, and a minimal, justified permission footprint.

  6. Consolidated Reporting for Engineering and Leadership

    7. Delivered defect density tables, a requirement coverage matrix, a tiered security remediation roadmap, and a release-readiness assessment, giving both the engineering team and leadership a shared, evidence-based view of where the platform stood.

Result

Prioritized Engineering Backlog

Rather than a flat list of defects, the client received a module-ranked, severity-tagged view of exactly where quality risk was concentrated across both the mobile app and admin panel.

Security Posture Benchmarked, Not Assumed

The security assessment gave the client an independent, evidence-based picture of their Android app's security configuration — including a clear, prioritized remediation roadmap for the gaps identified and confirmation of the controls already working correctly.

Release-Readiness Clarity

With 100% requirement coverage and a documented pass/fail breakdown across both functional and security dimensions, the client's leadership had a single, consolidated basis for release decisions rather than relying on separate, disconnected reports.

Conclusion

For a fintech platform handling real payments and customer financial data, functional correctness and security posture aren't separate conversations — a broken workflow and an unhardened network configuration both erode the same thing: user trust. By running functional testing and security assessment as one coordinated engagement, Testvox gave this client a single, prioritized view of what needed fixing before scaling further, across both the app experience and the security foundation underneath it.

Related Resources